Matthew Rudoy's Insightful Take on the Controversial Michael Jackson Biopic

Published on April 26, 2026, at 10:04 AM EDT, Matthew Rudoy serves as ScreenRant's Senior Movie & Television Editor, specializing in major franchise coverage including Star Wars, The Boys, and Game of Thrones. His career spans from writing lists in 2017 to becoming a senior editor in 2026. Rudoy offers a critical perspective on the recent Michael Jackson biopic, highlighting its 97% Rotten Tomatoes score and $100 million domestic box office projection despite widespread allegations of historical abuse.

While the film features the 2019 documentary Leaving Neverland—where Wade Robson and James Safechuck recount alleged childhood sexual abuse—the director Dan Reed questions why Jackson's legacy persists amid such claims. Rudoy points out contradictions in industry responses, noting Antoine Fuqua's ironic accusation of "gold digging" against the film's creators while Jackson's estate profits from its success. He emphasizes that legal outcomes differ from public perception, citing the 10-year statute of limitations that prevented financial compensation for accusers despite their allegations.

Revenue data reveals a stark divide: Jackson's estate earned $400 million from the biopic's pre-release hype, though actual earnings remain unconfirmed. Rudoy argues audiences prioritize entertainment over accountability, stating, "If you're going to enjoy Michael Jackson's music, consider how his alleged actions impact your enjoyment." He contrasts this with the film's critical reception, noting its 38% Tomatometer score versus the 97% audience rating, suggesting viewers often disconnect art from artist. The article also details production elements, including Jaafar Jackson's portrayal of Michael and promotional imagery of iconic moments from the Jackson catalog.